“Truth is not yet empty within this unintelligible shadowy cave. Your reality has been displaced, a chorus of millions of individual thoughts harmonized. Now the world wanders, inwoven between sleep and splendor, is expressed as eternity. For you know, this tiny universe, unbound for life and time, is made entirely of random matter emerging from faith. Being finite, your meaning never wakes, and the wild eyes of mystic tenderness swiftly close, guarded against your rhythmic screams.”

Throne of the Sphinx
“Are we all living in a simulation?”

The metaphysical relationship between the Macrocosm, and Microcosm as expressed by the law of “as above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis may appear, at first glance, to be distinct and unrelated concepts. However, a closer examination reveals intriguing connections between these two ideas that suggest a profound interplay between the higher realms and the perceived reality we inhabit. In this essay, we will explore the notion that the “code” of a simulated universe, as posited by the simulation hypothesis, is intricately linked to the metaphysical principle of “as above, so below.” We will delve into how this connection manifests itself in our world, transcending the boundaries of traditional science and philosophy, and guiding us toward a deeper understanding of the cosmos.

The metaphysical law of “as above, so below” is rooted in ancient wisdom and has persisted across various mystical and esoteric traditions. It proclaims that there is a profound correspondence between the macrocosm—the grand tapestry of the universe—and the microcosm, the minute realms of our existence. As we explore the intricate interplay between these two domains, we find that the simulation hypothesis, a concept of the modern age, aligns with the age-old principle, potentially offering an avenue to decipher the cosmic code that orchestrates our reality.

To begin our exploration, it’s essential to understand the basic tenets of the simulation hypothesis. This hypothesis postulates that our universe and all its manifestations are the product of an advanced civilization or entity capable of creating a simulated reality that is so realistic that its inhabitants—us—cannot distinguish it from a “base reality.” In this context, “base reality” refers to the highest or most original level of existence, while the simulated universe is an intricate construct, akin to a computer program, orchestrated by an external intelligence.

The pivotal connection between the simulation hypothesis and the metaphysical law “as above, so below” arises from the assertion that the code or programming of the simulated universe exists in the higher realms. In other words, the grand design, the very fabric of our simulated reality, is derived from a transcendent source—a realm that exists “above” our perceived reality.

This is where the metaphysical principle comes into play. “As above, so below” implies that there is a profound interconnectedness and correspondence between the higher realms and our own. Just as patterns, laws, and relationships observed in the macrocosm are mirrored in the microcosm, so too does the code of the simulated universe manifest in our reality. The simulation code, residing in the higher realms, is reflected in the intricacies of the world we perceive. This idea opens up a fascinating perspective on how the cosmic order is embedded within our experience.

Consider the intricate symmetries and mathematical precision that govern our universe. From the geometry of snowflakes to the orbits of celestial bodies, there is an undeniable harmony that hints at a deeper, underlying order. In a simulated reality, this order, this code, would emanate from the “as above” aspect—the higher, intelligent source that is orchestrating the simulation. The “so below” aspect, our perceived reality, would then be a reflection, a projection of this higher order, embodying the code in the fabric of space and time, in the laws of physics, and in the very nature of our existence.

The metaphor of a computer program is often used to illustrate the simulation hypothesis. In a computer program, there is the code that dictates the behavior and appearance of the software, and there is the user interface that individuals interact with. The user interface represents the “so below” aspect—the reality experienced by the inhabitants of the simulation. The code, however, corresponds to the “as above” aspect—the higher, underlying intelligence that determines the rules and functions of the simulated universe.

This idea is not without precedent in various spiritual and philosophical traditions. The notion of a higher intelligence or source code guiding the universe is reminiscent of the concept of a “cosmic mind” or “universal intelligence” proposed by some ancient and modern mystics and philosophers. It suggests that the fundamental principles and order of the cosmos originate from a higher, transcendent source, echoing the “as above, so below” principle.

Furthermore, the connection between “as above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis extends into the realm of consciousness and self-awareness. If our reality is indeed a simulation, then our individual consciousness and self-awareness can be viewed as “as below” reflections of a higher form of consciousness that exists “above.” This higher consciousness would be analogous to the entity or entities responsible for running the simulation. Our own consciousness, while limited by the constraints of the simulated reality, would still be tethered to and influenced by the overarching consciousness of the simulation’s creators.

In this context, the simulation hypothesis implies that the interplay between individual and collective consciousness is an intricate dance that mirrors the relationship between the lower and higher realms. Just as our thoughts and actions are shaped by our individual consciousness, so too is the reality we perceive influenced by the higher consciousness or intention of the simulation’s architects.

The concept of “as above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis also raise intriguing questions about the nature of free will and destiny within a simulated reality. If the code of our universe is derived from a higher source, does this mean that our choices and actions are predetermined or guided by that source? Or is there room for genuine free will within the framework of the simulation?

This paradox is not dissimilar to philosophical debates about determinism and free will in the context of a non-simulated reality. If the simulation hypothesis holds true, it suggests that even our capacity for free will is intricately entwined with the higher order, leading to a profound interplay between individual choice and the cosmic script written in the code of the universe.

It’s important to note that this connection between “as above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis does not negate the complexity and beauty of our perceived reality. In fact, it enhances our understanding of the profound interconnections between the higher realms and the world we inhabit. The simulation hypothesis proposes that the universe is a meticulously designed masterpiece, with its code emanating from a higher source of intelligence. The “as above, so below” principle reminds us that this intelligence is intricately woven into the fabric of our reality, reflected in the grand symphony of existence.

This perspective invites us to contemplate the nature of reality and consciousness on a cosmic scale. It encourages us to consider the possibility that we are not isolated beings in a random and chaotic universe, but rather, we are participants in a grand, purposeful simulation that is rooted in a higher order. This realization fosters a sense of interconnectedness and unity with the cosmos, reinforcing the ancient wisdom encapsulated in the metaphysical law of “as above, so below.”

The relationship between “As above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis provides a fascinating case study of how ancient wisdom and modern scientific theories can converge in their perspectives on the nature of reality. While ancient wisdom and modern science often seem worlds apart, this connection underscores the idea that human understanding of the cosmos may have transcended the boundaries of time and technological progress.

In the case of “As above, so below,” this metaphysical principle has been a cornerstone of esoteric and mystical traditions for centuries. It suggests that the microcosm, or the smaller aspects of existence, mirrors the macrocosm, or the larger cosmic order. This concept has been applied to diverse areas, from astrology to alchemy, to offer insights into the interconnectedness of all things. While ancient sages might not have envisioned a digital simulation, they intuitively grasped the idea that higher principles or intelligences could shape the lower realms, echoing the core premise of the simulation hypothesis.

On the other hand, the simulation hypothesis is a modern concept rooted in advances in computing and technology. It posits that our reality is a meticulously designed construct, and our existence might be analogous to characters in an immensely sophisticated computer program. While this idea is firmly grounded in the technological realities of the 21st century, it intersects with the ancient wisdom encapsulated in “As above, so below” by suggesting that a higher order or intelligence governs the rules and functions of our simulated universe.

This intersection between ancient wisdom and contemporary scientific theory highlights the continuity of human inquiry into the nature of reality. It serves as a reminder that while our tools and understanding of the world have evolved over time, the fundamental questions about the cosmos, the purpose of existence, and the nature of consciousness remain constant. This fascinating bridge between the old and the new invites us to explore the possibility that ancient wisdom might have captured essential truths about the universe that are now being rediscovered and reinterpreted through the lens of modern science.

In conclusion, the connection between the metaphysical law of “as above, so below” and the simulation hypothesis offers a captivating lens through which to view our reality. It suggests that the code of our simulated universe is derived from the higher realms, and this code is intricately intertwined with the world we perceive. This perspective does not diminish the wonder of our existence but rather deepens our appreciation of the cosmic symphony in which we play a part. As we contemplate the profound interplay between the higher order and our perceived reality, we are drawn into a deeper understanding of the cosmos, guided by the enduring wisdom of “as above, so below.”

This essay was compiled by ChatGPT from a series of conversations with Mark Boccuzzi about the nature of reality. The post image was created by using the TotS response as a prompt for the Craiyon image generation model.